Head to head

La Roche-Posay Cicaplast Baume B5+ vs The Ordinary Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA

Same comparison whichever way you searched it: The Ordinary Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA vs La Roche-Posay Cicaplast Baume B5+.

The bottom line

La Roche-Posay Cicaplast Baume B5+ and The Ordinary Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA land in much the same place on performance, so value decides it: The Ordinary Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA does the same job for less.

Answer nine questions and the app picks between them for your skin.

La Roche-PosayCicaplast Baume B5+Moisturizer · ~€16See every ingredient in Cicaplast Baume B5+, decoded
The OrdinaryNatural Moisturizing Factors + HAMoisturizer · ~€6See every ingredient in Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA, decoded

Cost per use

Cicaplast Baume B5+

€0.20 an applicationabout 80 uses from 100 ml

measured: 2.5 fingertip units for face and neck, about 1.25 g; from €16 as read in September 2026 and a 100 ml pack.

how this is counted

About €0.20 an application, about 80 uses from 100 ml.

Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA

€0.25 an applicationabout 25 uses from 30 ml

measured: 2.5 fingertip units for face and neck, about 1.25 g; from €6 as read in September 2026 and a 30 ml pack.

how this is counted

About €0.25 an application, about 25 uses from 30 ml.

Per application, La Roche-Posay Cicaplast Baume B5+ is the cheaper: €0.20 against €0.25.

Which should you pick?

Pick Cicaplast Baume B5+ if

  • fine lines and firmness are the goal

Pick Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA if

  • you are dealing with breakouts and oiliness
  • you want the more affordable option

What each delivers

HydrationBarrierBrighteningOil-controlAnti-aging
Cicaplast Baume B5+Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA
  • Hydration
    1010
  • Barrier repair
    88
  • Brightening / tone
    33
  • Oil-control & blemishes
    68
  • Anti-aging
    75

Side by side

Cicaplast Baume B5+Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA
TypeMoisturizerMoisturizer
Key activesGlycerin, Shea Butter, Pro-vitamin B5Glycerin, Hyaluronic acid, Sodium PCA
TextureA rich, cushiony cream that sinks in slowly.A middleweight lotion, enough to comfort without feeling heavy.
FragranceNone detectedNone detected
Feeds Malassezia1 measured / none inferred3 measured / 3 inferred
PregnancyNo flagged activesNo flagged actives
Ingredients33 listed46 listed
Price~€16~€6

What's in one but not the other

The two labels share 5 of the 74 ingredients between them. The actives are where they part company.

What each one adds acts on The stratum corneum, Not established for La Roche-Posay Cicaplast Baume B5+ and The stratum corneum for The Ordinary Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA. That is the layer each is understood to act on, not how deep it travels.

If you have La Roche-Posay Cicaplast Baume B5+, do you need The Ordinary Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA?

The Ordinary Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA is a different bottle only for: hyaluronic acid, sodium pca, urea, linoleic acid, caprylic/capric triglyceride.

Which keeps longer

Cicaplast Baume B5+

a tube and one light-sensitive active: the packaging is doing work here.

where this comes from

The pack form is read off the packshot; the light-sensitive actives are the base's photostability rows, sourced on each glossary page; the period after opening is not read yet. Catalogue checked September 2026.

Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA

a tube and nothing on this label that light breaks; the period after opening not read yet.

The Ordinary Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA is the one to keep if you use it slowly: a tube, nothing on this label that light breaks.

Where each label stops telling you the dose

Ingredients are listed in order of how much is inside, but only down to 1%. Below that the brand may list them in any order it likes, so the bottom of a label is a set, not a ranking. These two stop being a ranking in very different places.

La Roche-Posay Cicaplast Baume B5+

  1. 1Aqua/Water/Eau
  2. 2Hydrogenated Polyisobutene
  3. 3Dimethicone
  4. 4Glycerin
  5. 5Butyrospermum Parkii Butter/Shea Butter
  6. 6Panthenol
  7. 7Zea Mays Starch/Corn Starch
  8. 8Propanediol
  9. 9Butylene Glycol
  10. 10Cetyl PEG/PPG-10/1 Dimethicone
  11. 11Trihydroxystearin
  12. 12Centella Asiatica Leaf Extract
  13. 13Polymnia Sonchifolia Root Juice
  14. 14Zinc Gluconate
  15. 15Madecassoside
  16. 16Manganese Gluconate
  17. 17Alpha-Glucan Oligosaccharide
  18. 18Silica
  19. 19Aluminum Hydroxide
  20. 20Magnesium Sulfate
  21. 21Mannose
  22. 22Capryloyl Glycine
  23. 23Caprylyl Glycol
  24. 24Vitreoscilla Ferment
  25. 25Citric Acid
  26. 26Trisodium Ethylenediamine Disuccinate
  27. 27Lactobacillus
  28. 28Acetylated Glycol Stearate
  29. 29Maltodextrin
  30. 30Polyglyceryl-4 Isostearate
  31. 31Tocopherol
  32. 32Pentaerythrityl Tetra-Di-T-Butyl Hydroxyhydrocinnamate
  33. 33CI 77891/Titanium Dioxide

3 of 33 sit below the line, marked by Tocopherol.

Below the line is not too little to work: ceramides, retinoids and peptides all act far under a percent. It means the position stops carrying information. Where the line falls is inferred from the first ingredient whose whole job is done at a fraction of a percent, so it is a close read of the label rather than a number from the formula sheet.

The molecule doing the work

Cicaplast Baume B5+Glycerin
Natural Moisturizing Factors + HAGlycerin

Better for…

  • Fine lines & firmnessCicaplast Baume B5+
  • Breakouts & congestionNatural Moisturizing Factors + HA
  • Dryness & dehydrationEither works

Who each suits

La Roche-Posay Cicaplast Baume B5+
dry, sensitive, normal · avoid with acne-prone skin, fungal acne prone, very oily skin and very sensitive skin
The Ordinary Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA
dry, normal · avoid with very sensitive skin (at high strength)

How a bottle's fit is read from its actives →

The Ordinary Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA is the cheaper of the two (~€6 vs ~€16).

Ready to pick one?

Affiliate links, so a purchase sends us a small commission at no extra cost to you. As an Amazon Associate, Glow Simplified earns from qualifying purchases. We make and sell nothing here, so the verdict above never bends toward a sale.

Common questions

Is La Roche-Posay Cicaplast Baume B5+ or The Ordinary Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA better for fine lines & firmness?

For fine lines & firmness, La Roche-Posay Cicaplast Baume B5+ is the stronger pick by our read of the two formulas. La Roche-Posay Cicaplast Baume B5+ and The Ordinary Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA land in much the same place on performance, so value decides it: The Ordinary Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA does the same job for less.

Which is cheaper, La Roche-Posay Cicaplast Baume B5+ or The Ordinary Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA?

The Ordinary Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA is the cheaper of the two (~€6 vs ~€16).

Can I use La Roche-Posay Cicaplast Baume B5+ and The Ordinary Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA together?

They are both moisturizers, so you would normally pick one rather than layer both in the same step. You can keep both and alternate them (morning and night, or on different days) if you like variety, but you do not need two.

What the scene shows

The cross-section at the top of this page is not decoration and not a diagram of the skin in general: it places the molecules these two are sold on at the layer each is understood to act on. La Roche-Posay Cicaplast Baume B5+ is placed by Glycerin (the stratum corneum), Shea Butter (the stratum corneum), Pro-vitamin B5 (the stratum corneum). The Ordinary Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA is placed by Glycerin (the stratum corneum), Hyaluronic acid (the stratum corneum), Sodium PCA (the stratum corneum). A layer is where an ingredient does its work, never how deep it travels, and never a claim about how well it works.

Back up to the scene

Compare it with…

33 duels are built for this moisturizer, Cetaphil Moisturizing Cream and CeraVe Moisturizing Cream among them: type a name, or pick one below.