How much cysteamine do you need? 5%+

The effective cysteamine percentage, by the vehicle-controlled trials, starts at 5%; no published dose comparison sets a ceiling.

Give it eight to twelve weeks: that is when the change first became measurable.

how it was measured

Measured on Melasma severity (MASI) and melanin index by mexameter; the first visit at which the change was measurable.

See it on the timeline, beside the others →

Dose line for Cysteamine: the trials worked from 5% with no measured ceiling; ticks at 5% where the named trials worked; only one strength has ever been tested, 5%: more irritation. Linear scale.5%, the only strength tested in leave-on use on human skin (Mansouri 2015): more irritation5%more irritationonly strength tested, Mansouri 20150%
The rose band is where the vehicle-controlled trials worked, open to the right because no dose comparison sets a ceiling; each tick is a concentration a named trial used, with its author and year; only one strength has ever been tested, 5% (Lima 2020), where the paper reports: more irritation; no product in our catalogue declares a percentage on the name. The scale is linear.

What cysteamine percentage is effective?

Every trial uses 5%.

5%+

The trials, and what they used
  • Cysteamine 5% cream, applied at bedtime for a short contact, beat placebo cream on mexameter contrast and MASI at 2 and 4 months in 50 patients with epidermal melasma (Mansouri 2015, double-blind, the maker co-authoring) and again in 40 patients read by Dermacatch and Mexameter (Farshi 2018).
  • Against 4% hydroquinone it lost on mMASI, 38% against 53% at 120 days in 40 women, with erythema and burning the common complaints (Lima 2020).
  • No dose comparison found; 5% is the only concentration ever tested and the only one sold, so the floor and the product are the same number.

Is more than 5% cysteamine better?

Nobody has measured it: no published dose comparison sets a ceiling for cysteamine, so a percentage above 5% is above the trials' floor, not above a measured maximum. Only one strength has ever been tested, 5% (Lima 2020), and the paper reports more irritation there.

Erythema and burning were the most important local adverse effects with cysteamine, although their frequency did not differ between groups (P > 0.170).

The highest dose tested, in the paper’s words
  • Erythema and burning were the most important local adverse effects with cysteamine, although their frequency did not differ between groups (P > 0.170).

No published dose comparison sets a ceiling for cysteamine. A declared percentage above 5% is above the trials' floor, not above a measured maximum: the trials say from 5% it works, and say nothing about whether more does more.

What does the cysteamine percentage on a label tell you?

A name that states a percentage ("Cysteamine 5%") is the only amount a cosmetic label ever declares, so it is the one number that can be read against the trials: at or above the 5% floor, or below it.

A name without a percentage leaves the position. The rules make a brand list ingredients in descending order of amount down to 1%, and in any order below it, so cysteamine above the 1% line is at least 1% and cysteamine below it can be any trace the brand likes. The floor the trials worked from is 5%, and a position alone cannot tell you whether a label reaches it.

The cysteamine percentages in our catalogue

No product in our catalogue is sold on cysteamine yet.

Read on

Other actives with a dose the trials pinned:

The range column was researched and verified in September 2026 (this row last changed 22 September 2026). The number is the trials' and the reasoning is the knowledge base's; neither is advice about your skin. How we score.